Analysis / opinion

A watchdog publication should invite scrutiny of its own work. We believe every serious allegation should lead readers to its evidence, and every correction should leave a visible record.

Attributed claim

HRW’s July 2025 account of proposed changes to Ethiopia’s civil society law describes a consultation involving selected organizations and government institutions. HRW [1] ↗

EDITORIAL EXCERPT

A watchdog publication should invite scrutiny of its own work.

Analysis / opinion

Our view is that public access to draft texts, meaningful consultation and reviewable decisions are essential tests of accountable governance. That is an editorial judgment, not a finding about any individual’s criminal responsibility.

Analysis / opinion

Criticism must remain precise: name the institution, identify the action, and explain the evidence. A government, a country and an ethnic community are not interchangeable subjects.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

Sources & further reading

  1. [1]
HELP KEEP THE RECORD ACCURATE

Request a correction

Corrections are public GitHub issues. A GitHub account is required. Continuing sends this draft to GitHub; it is published only when you submit the issue there. Do not include confidential information or identifying details about vulnerable people.

Open a blank correction issue ↗