A watchdog publication should invite scrutiny of its own work. We believe every serious allegation should lead readers to its evidence, and every correction should leave a visible record.
HRW’s July 2025 account of proposed changes to Ethiopia’s civil society law describes a consultation involving selected organizations and government institutions. HRW [1] ↗
EDITORIAL EXCERPTA watchdog publication should invite scrutiny of its own work.
Our view is that public access to draft texts, meaningful consultation and reviewable decisions are essential tests of accountable governance. That is an editorial judgment, not a finding about any individual’s criminal responsibility.
Criticism must remain precise: name the institution, identify the action, and explain the evidence. A government, a country and an ethnic community are not interchangeable subjects.
Sources & further reading
- [1]Ethiopia: Proposed Legal Changes Threaten Civil Society ↗
Human Rights Watch · Jul 29, 2025